Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
The highest level of evidence for your project
At Maxeome, we deliver the gold-standard in evidence: systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and network meta-analyses (NMA), focused on dermatology and aesthetic medicine. Our work is not just about summarizing studies, but about generating high-quality evidence, clinical credibility, and strategic impact.
What We Offer
Systematic Literature Reviews
Structured reviews tailored for regulatory filings, publications, HTAs, or clinical guideline support.
Meta-Analyses
Quantitative synthesis of data using advanced statistical methods to generate robust conclusions.
Network Meta-Analyses (NMA)
Comparative effectiveness studies across multiple interventions when head-to-head studies are lacking.
Literature Reviews
Narrative, scoping, or targeted reviews to map evidence, find gaps, support early R&D, inform stakeholders, or prepare strategic communications.
Strategic Value for Sponsors
Evidence Gap Analysis
Evidence gap analysis is a structured review of the existing literature to identify areas where evidence is insufficient, inconsistent, or completely missing.
We systematically identify what is known, what is uncertain, and what is missing in the scientific literature on a specific topic. It is especially useful for sponsors, research teams, and decision-makers who need to invest in studies that truly move the field forward, not repeat what is already known.
Discover what is missing before you invest
What has already been studied
What remains uncertain or poorly understood
Where there is no reliable evidence at all